Daily Trade News

The $31 trillion time bomb ticking for markets


The clock is ticking for banks, insurers and asset managers still providing support to oil, gas and coal producers. It’s not just the moral imperative—that fossil-fuel use is destroying the atmosphere and life on Earth with it. It’s that their financial health requires leaving such companies behind.

According to Moody’s Investors Service, financial institutions in the Group of 20 leading industrial and developing nations have $US22 trillion ($30.6 trillion) of exposure to carbon-intensive industries. That’s equal to about 20 per cent of their total loans and investments. So unless these firms make a swift shift to climate-friendly financing, they risk reporting losses, Moody’s said.

According to Moody’s Investors Service, financial institutions in the Group of 20 leading industrial and developing nations have $US22 trillion of exposure to carbon-intensive industries. That’s equal to about 20 per cent of their total loans and investments.

According to Moody’s Investors Service, financial institutions in the Group of 20 leading industrial and developing nations have $US22 trillion of exposure to carbon-intensive industries. That’s equal to about 20 per cent of their total loans and investments.Credit:AP

Banks, insurers and asset managers need to adjust their “business models toward lending and investing in new and developing green infrastructure projects, while supporting corporates in carbon-intensive sectors that are pivoting to low-carbon business models,” the credit-rating company wrote in a report last week.

The warning from Moody’s was followed this week by the European Central Bank, which said most lenders have yet to produce concrete plans showing how they will change their business strategies to account for the climate crisis. While about half of the 112 institutions overseen by the ECB are “contemplating setting exclusion targets for some segments of the market, only a handful of them mention actively planning to steer their portfolios on a Paris-compatible trajectory,” Executive Board member Frank Elderson said in a blog post.

When combined, the statements underscore the business urgency for the financial-services industry to end its role as an enabler of dangerous carbon emissions.

Loading

On this issue, things have been getting worse rather than better. Banks, for example, have organised almost $US4 trillion of bonds and loans for the oil, gas and coal sectors since the 2015 Paris climate agreement, compared with only $US1.6 trillion of green-labelled bonds and loans, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Earlier this month, it was announced that more than 450 firms are now part of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. The signatories have pledged to targeting net-zero CO2 emissions by mid-century across their lending and investment portfolios. Taking global warming seriously is turning into a litmus test for the financial industry, with those failing to meet the moment at increasing risk of being publicly shamed. But such promises have repeatedly been made—by nations, companies and financial institutions—and repeatedly broken. Public shaming hasn’t seemed to move the needle. But money might.



Read More: The $31 trillion time bomb ticking for markets